Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is way better than Moto G7 Power's score of 72.6. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, while Moto G7 Power counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Although Galaxy A90 5G and the Moto G7 Power were released with only 7 months difference, the Galaxy A90 5G construction is thinner but also a bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a better display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a way higher resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor. Galaxy A90 5G features much more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Moto G7 Power features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.