Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is much better than the Moto G7 Power, with an 83.3 score against 72.6. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M30s has the older 11 version while Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy M30s construction is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the Moto G7 Power, although both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
Galaxy M30s has a better display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a little larger screen, a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a higher pixel count per inch of display. Galaxy M30s features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy M30s also has 1 GB more RAM.
Galaxy M30s has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy M30s also has 64 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with greater battery duration than Moto G7 Power, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Galaxy M30s captures much better videos and photos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Galaxy M30s also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.