Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than Motorola Moto G7 Power, getting a general score of 87.1 against 72.6. Galaxy Note9's construction is just a little bit heavier but a bit thinner than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and they were released with only a couple months difference. The Galaxy Note9 has a bit superior CPU than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note9 has a sharper display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a bit bigger screen, a lot better pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G7 Power has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Galaxy Note9 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video quality and a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy Note9 also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a bigger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Although Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7 Power. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Note9, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto G7 Power, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.