Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G7 Power's score of 72.6. Even though Galaxy S6 edge+ is a lot older than Motorola Moto G7 Power, it's design is incredibly lighter and much thinner. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version while Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a much higher pixels count per inch of screen.
Moto G7 Power has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ captures slightly better photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a larger sensor, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G7 Power, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.