Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Moto G7 Power, with a general score of 77.8 against 72.6. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Moto G7 Power, although it is just a little bit heavier.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power has a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper screen than Moto G7 Power, because it has a greater pixel density, a bigger display and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G7 Power, because it has a 14% larger battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a much better video quality, a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Moto G7 Power, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.