Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 279 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto G7 Power's 72.6 score. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and Motorola Moto G7 Power were released with only a couple of months difference, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher pixel quantity in each inch of display and a lot higher 1080 x 2246 resolution. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a bigger sensor, higher video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G7 Power has superior battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7 Power. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G7 Power, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.