Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than the Motorola Moto G7, having a global score of 83.7 against 75.2. These phones include Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Moto G7.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a quite larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better display pixels density. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has better battery duration than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V50 ThinQ also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture.
LG V50 ThinQ is a lot more expensive than Moto G7, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.