Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is better than the Motorola Moto G7's overall score of 75.2. Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while Motorola Moto G7 counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Even though the Galaxy A32 is newer than Motorola Moto G7, it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy A32 has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G7. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. Moto G7 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2270 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A32 has a superior camera than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A32 also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera. Galaxy A32 has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a way better battery duration than Moto G7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.