Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than Motorola Moto G7, having a general score of 91.8 against 75.2. Even though Galaxy A71 5G is newer than Motorola Moto G7, it's a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better screen than Moto G7, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera. The Galaxy A71 5G has much more storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G7, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior battery life than Moto G7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G7, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.