Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is way better than Moto G7's 75.2 global score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while Moto G7 counts with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Although it's the best phone we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Moto G7.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a little lower pixels amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite bigger screen. Galaxy A90 5G has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Moto G7, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit superior CPU than Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A90 5G features a much longer battery life than Moto G7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a lot better camera than Moto G7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.