Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than Moto G7's score of 75.2. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has older 6.0 Marshmallow version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy C9 Pro's construction is thinner than the Moto G7, but it is just a bit heavier and was released many years before.
Moto G7 counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2270 pixels resolution, a quite better pixels count per inch of screen and a little bigger display. Moto G7 features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G7 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features better battery life than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Moto G7 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.