Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is better than Moto G7, having an 88 score against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy M31s's body is newer than the Moto G7's, but it's thicker and heavier. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M31s has 11 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M31s counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G7, and although they both have the same display density, the Galaxy M31s also has a little bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy M31s counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy M31s also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M31s features a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto G7, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.