Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto G7's 75.2 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is newer and way thinner than the Moto G7's, although it's also noticeably heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better looking display than Moto G7, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a little bit more pixels per inch of display and a bigger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G7 has a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto G7, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Moto G7, because it has a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto G7, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.