Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than the Moto G71 5G, with a 91.8 score against 82.9. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is just a little bit thinner than the Moto G71 5G, but it is a little heavier and was released just 17 months before. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should offer all the same OS features.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G71 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a display that's just as good as Motorola Moto G71 5G's screen, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a little bit worse pixels density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G71 5G has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior camera than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.