Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than Moto G71 5G, having a overall score of 84.9 against 82.9. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A80's construction is older, thicker and heavier than Moto G71 5G. The Galaxy A80 features a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in Moto G71 5G, and although the Galaxy A80 has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Moto G71 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Moto G71 5G also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count in each inch in the screen. Moto G71 5G and Galaxy A80 feature really similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory.
The Moto G71 5G counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A80 captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a lower resolution back camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.