Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the Moto G73 5G's general score of 73.8. The LG Velvet features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G73 5G, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
The LG Velvet features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G73 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has an extremely better processor than Motorola Moto G73 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Moto G73 5G has superior battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh. The LG Velvet captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G73 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with less MP resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.