Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is much better than Moto G73 5G's score of 73.8. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features an extremely better CPU than Moto G73 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better screen than Moto G73 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a little bit worse pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Galaxy A50 counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G73 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G73 5G has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G73 5G has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G73 5G also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.