Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than Motorola Moto G73 5G, with an 86.6 score against 73.8. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Motorola Moto G73 5G has Android 13. The Galaxy A50s counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G73 5G, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a just a little worse pixels density and a little bit smaller screen.
Galaxy A50s features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G73 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50s has a very superior processor than Moto G73 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Moto G73 5G counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy A50s features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G73 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video and a back facing camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.