Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than Moto G73 5G, with a global score of 85.5 against 73.8. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Moto G73 5G has Android 13 version. Galaxy A51 features a much more powerful processor than Moto G73 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G73 5G. Both of them have a greater count of pixels per display inch, the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a display of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G73 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
Moto G73 5G has greater battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy A51 captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G73 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and a camera with less MP resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.