Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G73 5G's 73.8 global score. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and Motorola Moto G73 5G has Android 13. The Galaxy A52 5G construction has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G73 5G, but it's notably heavier.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto G73 5G. Both of them have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, a higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a display with the same size. The Galaxy A52 5G features a much powerful processing unit than Moto G73 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G73 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Moto G73 5G features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Moto G73 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.