Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Motorola Moto G73 5G, having a 98.9 score against 73.8. These phones work with the same Android 13 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better hardware performance than Moto G73 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Moto G73 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a little larger screen and a bit higher pixel density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Moto G73 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a lot better video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G73 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G73 5G has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.