Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G73 5G's 73.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE body has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G73 5G, but it's extremely heavier. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Motorola Moto G73 5G has Android 13.
Galaxy S20 FE features a lot better performance than Motorola Moto G73 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better screen than Moto G73 5G. Both of them have a display with the same size, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px and the same display pixels density.
The Motorola Moto G73 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G73 5G also has a camera in the back with a way better 50 megapixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G73 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Moto G73 5G has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.