Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| Lucent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 930 MT6855 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has an overall score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the Moto G73 5G's score of 73.8. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G73 5G has Android 13 version. Galaxy S7 edge has a much more powerful processing unit than Moto G73 5G, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a more vivid display than Moto G73 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto G73 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G73 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G73 5G also counts with faster video frame rate and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola Moto G73 5G has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.