Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a global score of 85, which is better than the Moto G8 Power Lite's 74.3 global score. IPhone 8 is an noticeably older phone than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's much lighter and thinner anyway. Apple iPhone 8 has a more vivid screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 750 x 1334 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
IPhone 8 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone 8 has a little better hardware performance than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone 8 features a much better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a lot lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments. Moto G8 Power Lite has a really longer battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.