Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's overall score of 74.3. Google Pixel 2 is an noticeably older cellphone than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but it is thinner and a lot lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 2 features a much better screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 256 GB. The Google Pixel 2 features a CPU that's just as good as the processor in Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Moto G8 Power Lite features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh. The Google Pixel 2 features a slightly better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.