Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Moto G8 Power Lite, with an 81.2 score against 74.3. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. LG V40 ThinQ is an older device than Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a lot better display pixel density.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The LG V40 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto G8 Power Lite has a very superior battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG V40 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.