Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, having a global score of 82.3 against 74.3. Galaxy A60's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, although it was released around 10 months before. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Galaxy A60 has 11 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy A60 features a more vivid screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a lot better pixel amount per inch of display. Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A60, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A60, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Moto G8 Power Lite has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A60 has a bit better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a 16 mega pixels back facing camera, the Galaxy A60 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments and a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.