Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-20 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is way better than the Moto G8 Power Lite's 74.3 global score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version and Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A71 5G's construction is a bit lighter and thinner than the Moto G8 Power Lite, although they were released only a few months apart.
Galaxy A71 5G has a better screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite bigger display and a greater display density. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G is more expensive than the Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.