Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is slightly better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, getting a global score of 80.2 against 74.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note5 is incredibly older than the Moto G8 Power Lite, it's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note5. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and much more pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto G8 Power Lite features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G8 Power Lite also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Galaxy Note5 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Note5 also has a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments. The Moto G8 Power Lite has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.