Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-20 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 74.3. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Note9 is older and a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit better processor than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note9 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note9 has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better display pixels density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G8 Power Lite counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a lot bigger aperture to take better low light photos.
The Galaxy Note9 costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.