Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-20 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue and Turquoise | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ3 is just a bit better than the Moto G8 Power Lite, with a 79.6 score against 74.3. These phones come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System). Xperia XZ3 is an older and a little bit thicker phone than Moto G8 Power Lite, but Sony made it just a bit lighter anyway. The Sony Xperia XZ3 has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
Xperia XZ3 counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a way greater pixels density. Sony Xperia XZ3 takes much better pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Sony Xperia XZ3 also has a back facing camera with more megapixels and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Sony Xperia XZ3 has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Sony Xperia XZ3 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Moto G8 Power Lite features a much better battery performance than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3330mAh.
Although Sony Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G8 Power Lite, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G8 Power Lite. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G8 Power Lite, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.