Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power's 76 overall score. The Google Nexus 6P construction is a little lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. The Google Nexus 6P's processing unit is very similar to Moto G8 Power's CPU, and although the Google Nexus 6P has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Google Nexus 6P has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Moto G8 Power shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The Moto G8 Power features more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Moto G8 Power counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 45% more battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G8 Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto G8 Power, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.