Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, getting an 81.6 score against 76. Google Pixel 2 is an much older cellphone than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but Google managed to build it somewhat thinner and lighter. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a really smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G8 Power. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto G8 Power shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a bigger aperture for better images in poorly lited environments and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.