Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is better than Moto G8 Power's 76 score. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Note9 is older and a little heavier than the Moto G8 Power, it's construction is still a bit thinner. The Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a better screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 captures a bit better videos and photos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has more internal storage. Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.