Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Capri blue and Smoke black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 237.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G8 Power's 76 overall score. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, it's extremely thinner and also incredibly newer. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better screen than Moto G8 Power, because it has a larger display, a just a bit higher screen density and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. The Motorola Moto G8 Power features a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a way higher video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit longer battery life than Moto G8 Power, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G8 Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G8 Power, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.