Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is better than the Moto G8, having a score of 85 against 74.4. Apple iPhone 8's body is thinner and extremely lighter than the Moto G8, even though it was released many years before. The iPhone 8 has a better CPU than Moto G8, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone 8 counts with a more vivid display than Moto G8, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit worse 750 x 1334 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel amount in each display inch. The iPhone 8 features a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G8, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G8 has a way better battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 1821mAh. Apple iPhone 8 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G8, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light images, a worse (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a much worse 12 MP resolution.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G8. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G8, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.