Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.64 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Neon blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 237.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G8's score of 74.4. Google Pixel 2's body is thinner and way lighter than the Motorola Moto G8, although it was released 2 years before. Google Pixel 2 features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G8. Both have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 features a better looking screen than Moto G8, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a way greater screen pixel density and a higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution. The Moto G8 features a bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G8 has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh. The Google Pixel 2 has a camera that's just as good as the Moto G8 one, although the Google Pixel 2 has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera with way less MP and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.