Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-12 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than Motorola Moto G82, having a score of 83.7 against 74.7. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Moto G82 has Android 12. Despite being the best in this review, we must tell that it's also a noticeably older, just a little heavier and just a little thicker cellphone.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior processing unit than Moto G82. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ has a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better screen pixels density.
Motorola Moto G82 captures slightly better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G82 also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G82, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G82 has greater battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.