Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than the Moto G82's 74.7 general score. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version while Moto G82 has Android 12 version. Although it's the best device we compare here, it must be noted that it is also an older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker device.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior CPU than Moto G82. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy A71 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto G82, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a back facing camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Moto G82 counts with a little bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G82 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G82 has a little longer battery life than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.