Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-12 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is much better than Motorola Moto G82, having a overall score of 87.1 against 74.7. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, the Galaxy Note9 is a older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier device than the Motorola Moto G82. The Galaxy Note9 has a better looking display than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a much faster CPU than Moto G82. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Moto G82 features a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G82 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G82 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G82 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
The Moto G82 features greater battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.