Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G82, having a score of 77.8 against 74.7. These devices use Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version while Motorola Moto G82 has Android 12. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is extremely heavier than the Motorola Moto G82, it's a lot thinner and also newer.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Moto G82, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a bigger screen and a bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G82, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 10 GB more RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G82, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger aperture and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Moto G82, because it has a 14% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.