Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-09-14 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Moto G84, having an 83.7 score against 80.9. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Moto G84 has Android 13. LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater processing power than Motorola Moto G84, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Moto G84 counts with a slightly better looking screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels count in each display inch and a lot worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Moto G84 captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is worse for taking photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G84 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G84, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G84 has greater battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.