Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Moto G84's score of 80.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a very superior CPU than Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Moto G84 has just a bit better display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Motorola Moto G84 captures better photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a much larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy Note9 features slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G84 has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.