Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-28 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, getting a score of 80.3 against 76.7. Google Nexus 6P is an incredibly older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, but Google was able to build it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a CPU that is very similar to the CPU in Moto G9 Play, and although the Google Nexus 6P has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Nexus 6P has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution and much more pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto G9 Play has a greater storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G9 Play captures much better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Play also has faster 60 fps video frame rates, a larger aperture, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Moto G9 Play counts with a really longer battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.