Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is slightly better than Moto G9 Plus, getting an 84.2 score against 80.5. Galaxy A7 (2018)'s body is extremely lighter and incredibly thinner than the Moto G9 Plus, even though it was released around a year before. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2220px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a camera with way more MP, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A7 (2018)'s storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Moto G9 Plus one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a superior battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.