Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-07 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note9's body is just a little thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, although it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a better display pixels density. Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos and a camera with way more megapixels.
Moto G9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Note9 count with incredibly similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with better battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.