Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than the Moto G9 Power, getting a global score of 81.6 against 78.6. Google Pixel 2 is an incredibly older phone than the Moto G9 Power, but it is notably lighter and thinner anyway. Google Pixel 2 has a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G9 Power. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 has a sharper screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher screen density and a better 1080 x 1920px resolution. Moto G9 Power features a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Moto G9 Power also has a camera with lot more mega-pixels and higher video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power features a much better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Power counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 122 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.