Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has an overall score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G9 Power's 78.6 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is an noticeably older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, but it's incredibly thinner and extremely lighter anyway. The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a sharper display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a way higher display pixels density.
Moto G9 Power and Galaxy A7 (2018) count with very similar storage to install games and applications, they have the same internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto G9 Power takes slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and faster video frame rates.
Moto G9 Power features a way better battery life than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.