Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 263 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is better than Moto G9 Power's 78.6 general score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the newer 11 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10, providing you a couple nice extra features. Even when Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and Moto G9 Power were released only 6 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is thinner and lighter.
Galaxy A71 5G has a brighter display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy A71 5G features a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Moto G9 Power has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G has a much better camera than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same aperture and a 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.