Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-05 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 is much better than the Moto G9 Power, with a general score of 86.5 against 78.6. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M31 has a more recent 11 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy M31 is an older device than the Moto G9 Power, but Samsung made it a bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy M31 has a brighter screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto G9 Power has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M31, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M31 captures much better photos and videos than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and a 64 MP resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has a way better (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy M31 counts with a battery life that is just as good as the Moto G9 Power one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.